CFB
David Gist
RB · Tennessee Tech
Description
- Position
- RB
- Team
- Tennessee Tech
- Class
- —
- Jersey
- —
- Height
- —
- Weight
- —
- Hometown
- —
- Last active
- 2022
Accolades
0
No accolades.
2026 Projection
No 2026 projection (graduated, drafted, or non-skill position).
Season Stats
Regular season
Game Log
Latest season
| Wk | Opp | Car | Yds | TD | Y/C | Lng | Rec | RecYd | RecTD | KR | KRYd | KRTD | PR | PRYd | PRTD | Fum | Lost | FR |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Kansas | 16 | 34 | 0 | 2.1 | 11 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 5 | UT Martin | 7 | 22 | 1 | 3.1 | 8 | 2 | 39 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 6 | Southeast Missouri State | 13 | 63 | 0 | 4.8 | 24 | 6 | 44 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 7 | Tennessee State | 9 | 44 | 0 | 4.9 | 15 | — | — | — | 1 | 10 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | Kennesaw State | 15 | 35 | 0 | 2.3 | 7 | 2 | 15 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 9 | Eastern Illinois | 13 | 99 | 0 | 7.6 | 30 | 4 | 37 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2 | 0 | 0 |
| 10 | Lindenwood | 8 | 100 | 1 | 12.5 | 71 | 3 | 13 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 11 | North Alabama | 8 | 63 | 1 | 7.9 | 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | North Carolina Central | 3 | 1 | 0 | 0.3 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 0 |
Stat Profile
2022 · vs 408 RBs
Rush Yds
46129
Y/C
5.054
Rush TD
328
Rec Yds
14870
PPA
0.1655
Usage
19%49
PlayerMedian (50th)percentile vs league
Volume vs Efficiency
2022 · vs 408
dashed lines = position median · top-right = high volume + efficiency
Career Arc
Rush Yds by season
PPA Trend
opp-adjusted / play
— Overall— Pass— Rush
Career Highs
| Stat | Best Season | Career |
|---|---|---|
| Rush Yds | 461'22 | 505 |
| Rush TD | 3'22 | 3 |
| Rec Yds | 148'22 | 170 |
Usage
2022 · share of team
Overall
19%
Rush
30%
Pass
7%
1st Down
22%
2nd Down
20%
3rd Down
11%
Standard Downs
21%
Passing Downs
14%
Usage Trend
share of team by season
— Overall— Standard Downs— Passing Downs
Game Trend
2022 · Rush Yds
Rush Yds per game
Consistency
2022 · Rush Yds
| Per game | 51.2 |
| Ceiling (90th) | 99.2 |
| Floor (10th) | 17.8 |
| Std dev | 31.5 |
| Boom rate | 22% |
| Bust rate | 22% |
| Profile | Volatile |
Boom ≥1.5× avg · Bust ≤0.5× avg · 9 games
PPA Profile
2022 · opp-adjusted / play
Overall
0.16
By play type
Pass
0.52
Rush
0.08
By down
1st Down
0.10
2nd Down
0.20
3rd Down
0.48
By down type
Standard Downs
0.10
Passing Downs
0.36
Points Per Attempt added vs the average play, adjusted for opponent strength. Right = above baseline, left = below.
PPA Splits
Opponent-adjusted PPA / play
| Season | Tm | PPA/Play | Pass | Rush | 1stDn | 2ndDn | 3rdDn | StdDn | PassDn | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Tennessee Tech | 0.16 | 0.52 | 0.08 | 0.10 | 0.20 | 0.48 | 0.10 | 0.36 | 17.9 |
| 2021 | Tennessee Tech | -0.17 | 0.08 | -0.31 | -0.17 | -0.21 | -0.11 | -0.20 | -0.09 | -1.9 |
| 2019 | Tennessee Tech | 0.10 | -0.72 | 0.24 | -0.45 | 0.52 | — | -0.32 | 1.17 | 0.7 |
| 2018 | Tennessee Tech | -0.61 | -0.32 | -0.69 | -1.02 | -0.26 | -0.38 | -0.87 | -0.28 | -5.5 |
News
0 items
No recent news.