How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Clemson — the basics
159 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 30-25 | 55% | +2.5 | n=55 |
| as an underdog | 10-6 | 63% | +5.7 | n=16 |
| spread 7.5-10.5 | 7-8 | 47% | -1.1 | n=15 |
| out of conference | 25-32 | 44% | +0.1 | n=57 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 81-67 | 55% | +1.4 | n=148 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 76-62 | 55% | +1.5 | n=138 |
| vs the SEC | 11-15 | 42% | -0.1 | n=26 |
| in September | 18-24 | 43% | -2.3 | n=42 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 29-38 | 43% | -2.7 | n=67 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Clemson — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -2.9 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 159 graded games: +1.3 pts vs their number per game | n=159 |
Clemson — combinations
25 lean Clemson · 58 lean against
Read this first. 115 combinations shown. The best one here is 64%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| as an underdog + out of conference | 7-4 | 64%from 63% | +7.2 | n=11 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +7.2 | n=11 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +7.2 | n=11 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 64% | +1.6 | n=8 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +7.2 | n=11 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 64% | +1.6 | n=8 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 64% | +1.6 | n=8 |
| as an underdog + vs an FBS opponent | 10-6 | 63%from 63% | +5.7 | n=16 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 10-6 | 63%from 63% | +5.7 | n=16 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | +1.6 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | +0.4 | n=8 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | +1.6 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | +0.4 | n=8 |
| as an underdog + vs a P5 opponent | 10-6 | 63%from 63% | +5.7 | n=16 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | +1.6 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 63% | +0.4 | n=8 |
| on the road + as an underdog | 3-2 | 60%from 55% | +5.3 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | +5.3 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | +5.3 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | +5.3 | n=5 |
| on the road + vs the SEC | 5-4 | 56%from 55% | +3.5 | n=9 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs a P5 opponent | 76-62 | 55%from 55% | +1.5 | n=138 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 27-31 | 47%from 55% | -2.6 | n=58 |
| + vs the SEC | 11-15 | 42%from 55% | -0.1 | n=26 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-8 | 27%from 42% | -4.5 | n=11 |
| + in September | 1-4 | 20%from 42% | -4.3 | n=5 |
| + in September | 11-15 | 42%from 55% | -4.1 | n=26 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-8 | 33%from 42% | -8.4 | n=12 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.