UL Monroe at Mississippi StateMississippi State -28.5o/u 55.5
ST Model Mississippi State -28.8(+0.3 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
UL Monroe — the basics
139 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 32-44 | 42% | -2.7 | n=76 |
| as an underdog | 44-62 | 42% | -1.7 | n=106 |
| spread 21+ | 15-21 | 42% | +0.3 | n=36 |
| out of conference | 19-28 | 40% | -2.3 | n=47 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 53-73 | 42% | -1.7 | n=126 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 10-19 | 34% | -3.8 | n=29 |
| vs the SEC | 5-12 | 29% | -5.1 | n=17 |
| in September | 19-20 | 49% | +0.8 | n=39 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 26-34 | 43% | -0.4 | n=60 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
UL Monroe — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -8.1 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 139 graded games: -1.8 pts vs their number per game | n=139 |
| UL Monroe has covered 2 straight | n=2 |
UL Monroe — combinations
2 lean UL Monroe · 242 lean against
Read this first. 255 combinations shown. The best one here is 56%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 58% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in September + in the last 5 seasons | 9-7 | 56%from 49% | +4.6 | n=16 |
| as an underdog + in September | 13-14 | 48%from 42% | +2.2 | n=27 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-6 | 50%from 48% | +4.6 | n=12 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in September | 15-17 | 47%from 42% | +0.8 | n=32 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-6 | 54%from 47% | +5.0 | n=13 |
| on the road + in September | 9-11 | 45%from 42% | -0.8 | n=20 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-6 | 25%from 45% | -5.6 | n=8 |
| out of conference + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 40% | +0.9 | n=20 |
| out of conference + in September | 12-15 | 44%from 40% | -1.4 | n=27 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-7 | 42%from 44% | +0.3 | n=12 |
| as an underdog + spread 21+ | 14-18 | 44%from 42% | +0.8 | n=32 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 14-18 | 44%from 44% | +0.8 | n=32 |
| + in September | 6-10 | 38%from 44% | +1.2 | n=16 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-14 | 36%from 44% | -1.4 | n=22 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-10 | 33%from 44% | +0.0 | n=15 |
| + vs the SEC | 5-11 | 31%from 44% | -4.6 | n=16 |
| + out of conference | 9-14 | 39%from 44% | -0.5 | n=23 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 9-14 | 39%from 39% | -0.5 | n=23 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-14 | 36%from 39% | -1.4 | n=22 |
| + vs the SEC | 5-11 | 31%from 39% | -4.6 | n=16 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-7 | 30%from 39% | -1.9 | n=10 |
| + in September | 4-10 | 29%from 39% | -3.1 | n=14 |
| + in September | 6-10 | 38%from 44% | +1.2 | n=16 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 1-6 | 14%from 38% | -4.1 | n=7 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-14 | 36%from 44% | -1.4 | n=22 |
| + vs the SEC | 5-11 | 31%from 36% | -4.6 | n=16 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-7 | 30%from 36% | -1.9 | n=10 |
| + in September | 3-10 | 23%from 36% | -4.8 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-10 | 33%from 44% | +0.0 | n=15 |
| + vs the SEC | 5-11 | 31%from 44% | -4.6 | n=16 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-6 | 25%from 31% | -6.3 | n=8 |
| + in September | 1-8 | 11%from 31% | -8.4 | n=9 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.