Kent State at South CarolinaSouth Carolina -34.5o/u 52.5
ST Model South Carolina -32.9(-1.6 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Kent State — the basics
132 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 31-41 | 43% | -2.8 | n=72 |
| as an underdog | 45-54 | 45% | -2.7 | n=99 |
| spread 21+ | 18-19 | 49% | -1.4 | n=37 |
| out of conference | 19-24 | 44% | -0.9 | n=43 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 55-67 | 45% | -2.2 | n=122 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 11-17 | 39% | -2.2 | n=28 |
| vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| in September | 17-23 | 43% | -0.6 | n=40 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 24-38 | 39% | -2.1 | n=62 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Kent State — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +5.4 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 132 graded games: -1.8 pts vs their number per game | n=132 |
Kent State — combinations
22 lean Kent State · 175 lean against
Read this first. 248 combinations shown. The best one here is 60%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 60% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs the SEC + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| on the road + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 43% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| as an underdog + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 45% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| spread 21+ + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 49% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| out of conference + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 44% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 45% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| vs a P5 opponent + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 39% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| spread 21+ + in September | 11-13 | 46%from 49% | -1.4 | n=24 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-7 | 50%from 46% | +2.1 | n=14 |
| as an underdog + vs an FBS opponent | 45-54 | 45%from 45% | -2.7 | n=99 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 45% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | +4.8 | n=5 |
| + in September | 3-4 | 43%from 50% | +2.7 | n=7 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 11-17 | 39%from 45% | -2.2 | n=28 |
| + vs the SEC | 4-4 | 50%from 39% | +2.7 | n=8 |
| + in September | 8-14 | 36%from 39% | -2.6 | n=22 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-9 | 36%from 39% | -1.8 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-29 | 34%from 45% | -3.9 | n=44 |
| + in September | 10-20 | 33%from 45% | -3.1 | n=30 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-10 | 33%from 33% | -0.6 | n=15 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.