Missouri State at Texas A&MTexas A&M -39o/u 52.5
ST Model Texas A&M -44.2(+5.2 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Missouri State — the basics
50 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 16-13 | 55% | +0.4 | n=29 |
| as an underdog | 15-13 | 54% | -0.1 | n=28 |
| spread 21+ | 10-5 | 67% | +0.2 | n=15 |
| out of conference | 12-8 | 60% | +0.7 | n=20 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 14-11 | 56% | -0.6 | n=25 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 9-1 | 90% | +7.5 | n=10 |
| in September | 11-9 | 55% | +1.0 | n=20 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 19-24 | 44% | +0.2 | n=43 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Missouri State — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +3.5 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 50 graded games: -0.3 pts vs their number per game | n=50 |
| Missouri State has failed to cover 3 straight | n=3 |
Missouri State — combinations
132 lean Missouri State · 2 lean against
Read this first. 145 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 67% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 16.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs a P5 opponent + in September | 8-0 | 100%from 90% | +11.8 | n=8 |
| as an underdog + vs a P5 opponent | 9-1 | 90%from 54% | +7.5 | n=10 |
| + in September | 8-0 | 100%from 90% | +11.8 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 90% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| spread 21+ + vs a P5 opponent | 9-1 | 90%from 67% | +7.5 | n=10 |
| + in September | 8-0 | 100%from 90% | +11.8 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 90% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| out of conference + vs a P5 opponent | 9-1 | 90%from 60% | +7.5 | n=10 |
| + in September | 8-0 | 100%from 90% | +11.8 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 90% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs a P5 opponent | 9-1 | 90%from 56% | +7.5 | n=10 |
| + in September | 8-0 | 100%from 90% | +11.8 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 90% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| on the road + vs a P5 opponent | 8-1 | 89%from 55% | +7.2 | n=9 |
| + in September | 7-0 | 100%from 89% | +11.9 | n=7 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 90% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| on the road + spread 21+ | 9-3 | 75%from 55% | +0.6 | n=12 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-1 | 89%from 75% | +7.2 | n=9 |
| + in September | 7-0 | 100%from 89% | +11.9 | n=7 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 75% | +5.6 | n=5 |
| + in September | 7-2 | 78%from 75% | +2.4 | n=9 |
| + out of conference | 8-3 | 73%from 75% | +0.3 | n=11 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-1 | 89%from 73% | +7.2 | n=9 |
| + in September | 7-2 | 78%from 73% | +2.4 | n=9 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 8-3 | 73%from 73% | +0.3 | n=11 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 8-3 | 73%from 75% | +0.3 | n=11 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-1 | 89%from 73% | +7.2 | n=9 |
| + in September | 7-2 | 78%from 73% | +2.4 | n=9 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.