How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Tulsa — the basics
139 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 42-29 | 59% | +1.0 | n=71 |
| out of conference | 25-24 | 51% | +1.0 | n=49 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 67-66 | 50% | -1.1 | n=133 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 11-8 | 58% | +0.3 | n=19 |
| in September | 19-24 | 44% | -0.6 | n=43 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 26-34 | 43% | -4.3 | n=60 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Tulsa — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +0.7 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 139 graded games: -1.0 pts vs their number per game | n=139 |
Tulsa — combinations
46 lean Tulsa · 4 lean against
Read this first. 56 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 65% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 4.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs a P5 opponent | 9-3 | 75%from 59% | +3.7 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 75% | +8.3 | n=5 |
| + in September | 8-1 | 89%from 75% | +8.2 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 89% | +8.3 | n=5 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 6-2 | 75%from 58% | +2.4 | n=8 |
| on the road + in September | 14-7 | 67%from 59% | +2.2 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-3 | 73%from 67% | +1.8 | n=11 |
| on the road + out of conference | 15-8 | 65%from 59% | +1.7 | n=23 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 65% | +4.5 | n=10 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-3 | 75%from 65% | +3.7 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 75% | +8.3 | n=5 |
| + in September | 8-1 | 89%from 75% | +8.2 | n=9 |
| + in September | 14-5 | 74%from 65% | +4.2 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 74% | +4.5 | n=10 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 15-8 | 65%from 65% | +1.7 | n=23 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 65% | +4.5 | n=10 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-3 | 75%from 65% | +3.7 | n=12 |
| + in September | 14-5 | 74%from 65% | +4.2 | n=19 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in September | 8-5 | 62%from 58% | +0.7 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 62% | +0.4 | n=7 |
| on the road + vs an FBS opponent | 42-29 | 59%from 59% | +1.0 | n=71 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-3 | 75%from 59% | +3.7 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 75% | +8.3 | n=5 |
| + in September | 8-1 | 89%from 75% | +8.2 | n=9 |
| + in September | 14-7 | 67%from 59% | +2.2 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-3 | 73%from 67% | +1.8 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 16-14 | 53%from 59% | -2.5 | n=30 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.