How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Texas A&M — the basics
145 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 22-25 | 47% | -1.2 | n=47 |
| vs South Carolina | 4-7 | 36% | -0.8 | n=11 |
| in a conference game | 41-52 | 44% | -1.2 | n=93 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 61-74 | 45% | -1.1 | n=135 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 51-62 | 45% | -1.0 | n=113 |
| vs the SEC | 41-52 | 44% | -1.2 | n=93 |
| in November | 14-28 | 33% | -2.4 | n=42 |
| at this venue | 2-3 | 40% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 24-37 | 39% | -1.4 | n=61 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Texas A&M — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -0.2 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 145 graded games: -1.0 pts vs their number per game | n=145 |
| Texas A&M has failed to cover 4 straight | n=4 |
Texas A&M — combinations
0 lean Texas A&M · 168 lean against
Read this first. 177 combinations shown. The best one here is 47%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 61% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs an FBS opponent | 22-25 | 47%from 47% | -1.2 | n=47 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 21-25 | 46%from 47% | -1.8 | n=46 |
| + vs the SEC | 18-24 | 43%from 46% | -1.9 | n=42 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 46% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 6-11 | 35%from 46% | -0.8 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-13 | 32%from 46% | -2.3 | n=19 |
| + vs the SEC | 18-24 | 43%from 47% | -1.9 | n=42 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 43% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 6-11 | 35%from 43% | -0.8 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-12 | 29%from 43% | -1.9 | n=17 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 47% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 6-11 | 35%from 47% | -0.8 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 1-7 | 13%from 35% | -6.6 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-13 | 32%from 47% | -2.3 | n=19 |
| on the road + vs a P5 opponent | 21-25 | 46%from 47% | -1.8 | n=46 |
| + vs the SEC | 18-24 | 43%from 46% | -1.9 | n=42 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 43% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 6-11 | 35%from 43% | -0.8 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-12 | 29%from 43% | -1.9 | n=17 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 46% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 6-11 | 35%from 46% | -0.8 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 1-7 | 13%from 35% | -6.6 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-13 | 32%from 46% | -2.3 | n=19 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs a P5 opponent | 51-62 | 45%from 45% | -1.0 | n=113 |
| + vs the SEC | 41-52 | 44%from 45% | -1.2 | n=93 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 17-21 | 45%from 44% | +1.5 | n=38 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 44% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 11-20 | 35%from 44% | -1.3 | n=31 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 19-28 | 40%from 45% | -0.3 | n=47 |
| + at this venue | 2-3 | 40%from 45% | -0.6 | n=5 |
| + in November | 11-21 | 34%from 45% | -1.7 | n=32 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-10 | 29%from 34% | -2.9 | n=14 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.