How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
North Carolina — the basics
146 graded games since 2014
| at a neutral site | 5-11 | 31% | -5.0 | n=16 |
| as an underdog | 29-31 | 48% | +0.7 | n=60 |
| spread 3.5-7 | 16-22 | 42% | -0.7 | n=38 |
| out of conference | 20-27 | 43% | -2.8 | n=47 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 62-74 | 46% | -1.3 | n=136 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 55-66 | 45% | -1.0 | n=121 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 24-38 | 39% | -3.9 | n=62 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
North Carolina — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -5.3 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 146 graded games: -1.1 pts vs their number per game | n=146 |
| North Carolina has failed to cover 3 straight | n=3 |
North Carolina — combinations
0 lean North Carolina · 74 lean against
Read this first. 83 combinations shown. The best one here is 50%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 67% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| as an underdog + vs an FBS opponent | 29-31 | 48%from 48% | +0.7 | n=60 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 28-31 | 47%from 48% | +0.6 | n=59 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-12 | 43%from 47% | -1.9 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-12 | 45%from 48% | -1.6 | n=22 |
| as an underdog + vs a P5 opponent | 28-31 | 47%from 48% | +0.6 | n=59 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-12 | 43%from 47% | -1.9 | n=21 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs a P5 opponent | 55-66 | 45%from 46% | -1.0 | n=121 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 19-32 | 37%from 45% | -4.0 | n=51 |
| as an underdog + in the last 5 seasons | 10-12 | 45%from 48% | -1.6 | n=22 |
| spread 3.5-7 + vs an FBS opponent | 16-22 | 42%from 42% | -0.7 | n=38 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 15-22 | 41%from 42% | -1.7 | n=37 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-11 | 35%from 41% | -3.6 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-11 | 35%from 42% | -3.6 | n=17 |
| spread 3.5-7 + vs a P5 opponent | 15-22 | 41%from 42% | -1.7 | n=37 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-11 | 35%from 41% | -3.6 | n=17 |
| out of conference + vs an FBS opponent | 15-22 | 41%from 43% | -4.0 | n=37 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-9 | 40%from 41% | -7.2 | n=15 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 8-14 | 36%from 41% | -3.8 | n=22 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-6 | 33%from 36% | -9.4 | n=9 |
| out of conference + in the last 5 seasons | 8-12 | 40%from 43% | -6.2 | n=20 |
| as an underdog + out of conference | 6-9 | 40%from 48% | -2.4 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 40% | -5.1 | n=6 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 6-9 | 40%from 40% | -2.4 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 40% | -5.1 | n=6 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-9 | 36%from 40% | -2.9 | n=14 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-9 | 36%from 40% | -2.9 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 36% | -7.1 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.