Boston College at CincinnatiCincinnati -7.5o/u 54.5
ST Model Cincinnati -9(+1.5 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Boston College — the basics
143 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 35-27 | 56% | +1.4 | n=62 |
| as an underdog | 46-37 | 55% | +1.3 | n=83 |
| spread 7.5-10.5 | 7-11 | 39% | -5.1 | n=18 |
| out of conference | 23-25 | 48% | -0.1 | n=48 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 69-65 | 51% | -0.1 | n=134 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 62-57 | 52% | -0.2 | n=119 |
| in September | 19-26 | 42% | -2.3 | n=45 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 29-32 | 48% | -1.1 | n=61 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Boston College — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -3.0 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 143 graded games: +0.4 pts vs their number per game | n=143 |
| Boston College has covered 2 straight | n=2 |
Boston College — combinations
48 lean Boston College · 51 lean against
Read this first. 114 combinations shown. The best one here is 67%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 83% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + spread 7.5-10.5 | 3-2 | 60%from 56% | -0.7 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | -0.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | -0.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | -0.7 | n=5 |
| on the road + as an underdog | 25-18 | 58%from 56% | +2.4 | n=43 |
| + out of conference | 3-2 | 60%from 58% | -4.3 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | -4.3 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 3-2 | 60%from 60% | -4.3 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 25-18 | 58%from 58% | +2.4 | n=43 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 25-18 | 58%from 58% | +2.4 | n=43 |
| + in September | 5-4 | 56%from 58% | -1.2 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 58% | -1.8 | n=20 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 25-18 | 58%from 58% | +2.4 | n=43 |
| + in September | 5-4 | 56%from 58% | -1.2 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 58% | -1.8 | n=20 |
| + in September | 5-4 | 56%from 58% | -1.2 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-3 | 50%from 56% | +0.3 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 58% | -1.8 | n=20 |
| as an underdog + in September | 8-6 | 57%from 55% | +1.5 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 57% | +3.5 | n=7 |
| on the road + vs an FBS opponent | 35-27 | 56%from 56% | +1.4 | n=62 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 33-26 | 56%from 56% | +1.1 | n=59 |
| + in September | 8-7 | 53%from 56% | -4.7 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-14 | 46%from 56% | -2.5 | n=26 |
| + in September | 9-8 | 53%from 56% | -3.6 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-5 | 44%from 53% | -3.8 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 13-14 | 48%from 56% | -2.1 | n=27 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.