How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Utah — the basics
144 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 35-25 | 58% | +4.3 | n=60 |
| vs Colorado | 7-5 | 58% | +3.6 | n=12 |
| in a conference game | 59-44 | 57% | +3.1 | n=103 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 75-60 | 56% | +2.6 | n=135 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 68-55 | 55% | +2.4 | n=123 |
| vs the Big 12 | 10-10 | 50% | +0.2 | n=20 |
| in October | 22-16 | 58% | +3.7 | n=38 |
| at this venue | 4-2 | 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 34-30 | 53% | +3.0 | n=64 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Utah — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +9.2 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 144 graded games: +2.6 pts vs their number per game | n=144 |
Utah — combinations
71 lean Utah · 43 lean against
Read this first. 141 combinations shown. The best one here is 67%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs Colorado | 4-2 | 67%from 58% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + in a conference game | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| on the road + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 58% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| vs Colorado + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 58% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| in a conference game + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 57% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| vs an FBS opponent + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 56% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| vs a P5 opponent + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 55% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| on the road + vs a P5 opponent | 32-22 | 59%from 58% | +4.8 | n=54 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 59% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 4-4 | 50%from 59% | +3.1 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 50% | +3.1 | n=8 |
| + in October | 9-10 | 47%from 59% | +2.5 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-6 | 25%from 47% | -3.4 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-13 | 46%from 59% | +1.4 | n=24 |
| on the road + vs an FBS opponent | 35-25 | 58%from 58% | +4.3 | n=60 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 58% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 32-22 | 59%from 58% | +4.8 | n=54 |
| + at this venue | 4-2 | 67%from 59% | +5.3 | n=6 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 4-4 | 50%from 59% | +3.1 | n=8 |
| + in October | 9-10 | 47%from 59% | +2.5 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-13 | 46%from 59% | +1.4 | n=24 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 4-4 | 50%from 58% | +3.1 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-4 | 50%from 50% | +3.1 | n=8 |
| + in October | 9-10 | 47%from 58% | +2.5 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-6 | 25%from 47% | -3.4 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-15 | 44%from 58% | +0.8 | n=27 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.