How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Kansas — the basics
135 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 24-37 | 39% | -1.3 | n=61 |
| vs TCU | 5-4 | 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| in a conference game | 49-54 | 48% | -0.6 | n=103 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 57-69 | 45% | -0.7 | n=126 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 53-59 | 47% | -0.0 | n=112 |
| vs the Big 12 | 49-54 | 48% | -0.6 | n=103 |
| in October | 20-21 | 49% | -1.1 | n=41 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 28-31 | 47% | +0.5 | n=59 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Kansas — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -7.0 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 135 graded games: -0.9 pts vs their number per game | n=135 |
Kansas — combinations
25 lean Kansas · 69 lean against
Read this first. 113 combinations shown. The best one here is 56%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 56% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs TCU + in a conference game | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| vs TCU + vs an FBS opponent | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| vs TCU + vs a P5 opponent | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| vs TCU + vs the Big 12 | 5-4 | 56%from 56% | +7.3 | n=9 |
| in a conference game + in the last 5 seasons | 22-21 | 51%from 48% | +0.9 | n=43 |
| vs the Big 12 + in the last 5 seasons | 22-21 | 51%from 48% | +0.9 | n=43 |
| in October + in the last 5 seasons | 8-8 | 50%from 49% | +0.6 | n=16 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 27-28 | 49%from 45% | +0.6 | n=55 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 24-25 | 49%from 47% | +0.6 | n=49 |
| in a conference game + in October | 20-21 | 49%from 48% | -1.1 | n=41 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-8 | 50%from 49% | +0.6 | n=16 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in October | 20-21 | 49%from 45% | -1.1 | n=41 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-8 | 50%from 49% | +0.6 | n=16 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in October | 20-21 | 49%from 47% | -1.1 | n=41 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-8 | 50%from 49% | +0.6 | n=16 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.