Akron at Wake ForestWake Forest -22.5o/u 49.5
ST Model Wake Forest -15.7(-6.8 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Akron — the basics
132 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 33-36 | 48% | -1.9 | n=69 |
| as an underdog | 43-51 | 46% | -2.6 | n=94 |
| spread 21+ | 7-20 | 26% | -7.6 | n=27 |
| out of conference | 15-25 | 38% | -2.1 | n=40 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 56-68 | 45% | -2.8 | n=124 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 7-14 | 33% | -5.3 | n=21 |
| in September | 12-26 | 32% | -3.2 | n=38 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 29-29 | 50% | -0.4 | n=58 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Akron — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +0.8 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 132 graded games: -2.4 pts vs their number per game | n=132 |
Akron — combinations
2 lean Akron · 145 lean against
Read this first. 162 combinations shown. The best one here is 52%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 59% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + as an underdog | 29-27 | 52%from 48% | -0.5 | n=56 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 29-27 | 52%from 52% | -0.5 | n=56 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-15 | 50%from 52% | +0.5 | n=30 |
| + in September | 9-13 | 41%from 52% | -1.8 | n=22 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-11 | 39%from 52% | -3.9 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-15 | 50%from 52% | +0.5 | n=30 |
| + out of conference | 11-12 | 48%from 52% | -1.1 | n=23 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 11-12 | 48%from 48% | -1.1 | n=23 |
| + in September | 9-10 | 47%from 48% | +0.7 | n=19 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-11 | 39%from 48% | -3.9 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-8 | 38%from 48% | -4.4 | n=13 |
| + in September | 9-13 | 41%from 52% | -1.8 | n=22 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-10 | 29%from 41% | -6.7 | n=14 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-11 | 39%from 52% | -3.9 | n=18 |
| + in September | 5-10 | 33%from 39% | -3.8 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-8 | 27%from 39% | -6.6 | n=11 |
| + spread 21+ | 7-15 | 32%from 52% | -6.6 | n=22 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 7-15 | 32%from 32% | -6.6 | n=22 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-9 | 25%from 32% | -6.2 | n=12 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 3-10 | 23%from 32% | -9.7 | n=13 |
| + out of conference | 3-11 | 21%from 32% | -10.6 | n=14 |
| + in September | 1-10 | 9%from 32% | -12.1 | n=11 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 27-27 | 50%from 45% | -0.8 | n=54 |
| as an underdog + in the last 5 seasons | 24-24 | 50%from 46% | -0.8 | n=48 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 16-16 | 50%from 48% | +0.3 | n=32 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.