How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Old Dominion — the basics
131 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 37-27 | 58% | +1.7 | n=64 |
| vs Virginia Tech | 4-3 | 57% | +10.8 | n=7 |
| out of conference | 23-22 | 51% | +1.5 | n=45 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 62-61 | 50% | +0.8 | n=123 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 13-10 | 57% | +2.8 | n=23 |
| vs the ACC | 9-6 | 60% | +5.4 | n=15 |
| in September | 22-18 | 55% | +2.1 | n=40 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 35-27 | 56% | +4.2 | n=62 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Old Dominion — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +4.1 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 131 graded games: +1.0 pts vs their number per game | n=131 |
Old Dominion — combinations
110 lean Old Dominion · 0 lean against
Read this first. 119 combinations shown. The best one here is 71%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 71% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs the ACC + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 60% | +6.6 | n=7 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 20-10 | 67%from 58% | +4.5 | n=30 |
| on the road + vs the ACC | 6-3 | 67%from 58% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 6-3 | 67%from 67% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 7-4 | 64%from 57% | +5.6 | n=11 |
| on the road + in September | 12-7 | 63%from 58% | +2.6 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-3 | 63%from 63% | +5.8 | n=8 |
| in September + in the last 5 seasons | 11-7 | 61%from 55% | +6.8 | n=18 |
| on the road + out of conference | 12-8 | 60%from 58% | +2.1 | n=20 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-3 | 67%from 60% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 6-3 | 67%from 67% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 10-6 | 63%from 60% | +2.1 | n=16 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 63% | +5.4 | n=7 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 12-8 | 60%from 60% | +2.1 | n=20 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-3 | 67%from 60% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 10-6 | 63%from 60% | +2.1 | n=16 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-6 | 60%from 60% | +2.0 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +5.0 | n=10 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-6 | 60%from 60% | +2.0 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 60% | +7.9 | n=7 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-3 | 67%from 60% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 7-5 | 58%from 60% | +0.7 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +5.0 | n=10 |
| on the road + vs a P5 opponent | 9-6 | 60%from 58% | +2.0 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 60% | +7.9 | n=7 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-3 | 67%from 60% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 6-3 | 67%from 67% | +5.4 | n=9 |
| + in September | 7-5 | 58%from 60% | +0.7 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-2 | 60%from 58% | +5.8 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.