SMU at LouisvilleLouisville -1.5o/u 56.5
ST Model Louisville -2.6(+1.1 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 3
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
SMU — the basics
145 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 29-40 | 42% | -1.9 | n=69 |
| as an underdog | 27-35 | 44% | -2.8 | n=62 |
| spread 1-3 | 10-11 | 48% | +1.3 | n=21 |
| in a conference game | 46-49 | 48% | +0.7 | n=95 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 65-73 | 47% | -0.8 | n=138 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 19-21 | 48% | +1.2 | n=40 |
| vs the ACC | 11-7 | 61% | +5.9 | n=18 |
| in September | 25-21 | 54% | +1.0 | n=46 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 32-33 | 49% | +1.8 | n=65 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
SMU — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +3.1 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 145 graded games: -0.6 pts vs their number per game | n=145 |
SMU — combinations
48 lean SMU · 72 lean against
Read this first. 134 combinations shown. The best one here is 80%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| in a conference game + in September | 4-1 | 80%from 48% | +9.2 | n=5 |
| in a conference game + vs a P5 opponent | 11-6 | 65%from 48% | +7.6 | n=17 |
| + vs the ACC | 11-6 | 65%from 65% | +7.6 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-6 | 65%from 65% | +7.6 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-6 | 65%from 65% | +7.6 | n=17 |
| in a conference game + vs the ACC | 11-6 | 65%from 48% | +7.6 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-6 | 65%from 65% | +7.6 | n=17 |
| on the road + vs the ACC | 5-3 | 63%from 42% | +5.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-3 | 63%from 63% | +5.7 | n=8 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs the ACC | 11-7 | 61%from 47% | +5.9 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-7 | 61%from 61% | +5.9 | n=18 |
| vs a P5 opponent + vs the ACC | 11-7 | 61%from 48% | +5.9 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-7 | 61%from 61% | +5.9 | n=18 |
| vs the ACC + in the last 5 seasons | 11-7 | 61%from 61% | +5.9 | n=18 |
| on the road + vs a P5 opponent | 11-8 | 58%from 42% | +3.6 | n=19 |
| + vs the ACC | 5-3 | 63%from 58% | +5.7 | n=8 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-3 | 63%from 63% | +5.7 | n=8 |
| + in September | 6-4 | 60%from 58% | +4.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 1-4 | 20%from 60% | -0.4 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-8 | 43%from 58% | +1.6 | n=14 |
| in a conference game + in the last 5 seasons | 24-18 | 57%from 48% | +4.3 | n=42 |
| on the road + in September | 10-9 | 53%from 42% | +0.9 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-6 | 25%from 53% | +0.9 | n=8 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in September | 21-19 | 53%from 47% | +0.4 | n=40 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-10 | 38%from 53% | +1.5 | n=16 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.