How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Georgia Tech — the basics
141 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 29-28 | 51% | +2.3 | n=57 |
| vs Virginia Tech | 6-4 | 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| in a conference game | 47-47 | 50% | +0.8 | n=94 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 67-67 | 50% | +0.4 | n=134 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 59-59 | 50% | +0.8 | n=118 |
| vs the ACC | 46-46 | 50% | +1.2 | n=92 |
| in October | 20-20 | 50% | +1.2 | n=40 |
| at this venue | 4-1 | 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 31-31 | 50% | +0.4 | n=62 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Georgia Tech — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -1.4 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 141 graded games: +0.2 pts vs their number per game | n=141 |
Georgia Tech — combinations
91 lean Georgia Tech · 20 lean against
Read this first. 166 combinations shown. The best one here is 80%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 62% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs Virginia Tech | 4-1 | 80%from 51% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + in a conference game | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs the ACC | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs the ACC | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs the ACC | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs the ACC | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| on the road + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 51% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| vs Virginia Tech + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 60% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| in a conference game + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 50% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| vs an FBS opponent + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 50% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| vs a P5 opponent + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 50% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| vs the ACC + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 50% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| vs Virginia Tech + in a conference game | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 60% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 60% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 60% | +11.7 | n=5 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + vs the ACC | 6-4 | 60%from 60% | +1.0 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 60% | +11.7 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.