Boston College at Duke

ST Model Duke -12.1
Trends · 2026 week 9
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Boston College — the basics
143 graded games since 2014
on the road35-2756%+1.4n=62
in a conference game51-4454%+0.7n=95
vs an FBS opponent69-6551%-0.1n=134
vs a P5 opponent62-5752%-0.2n=119
vs the ACC51-4354%+0.7n=94
in October25-2056%+1.5n=45
in the last 5 seasons29-3248%-1.1n=61
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Boston College — form & streaks
Last 12 games: -3.0 pts vs their number per gamen=12
All 143 graded games: +0.4 pts vs their number per gamen=143
Boston College has covered 2 straightn=2
Boston College — combinations
50 lean Boston College · 41 lean against
Read this first. 98 combinations shown. The best one here is 57%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 62% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
CombinationRec%PtsSample
in a conference game + in October23-1757%from 54%+2.2n=40
+ in the last 5 seasons5-936%from 57%-5.0n=14
vs the ACC + in October23-1757%from 54%+2.2n=40
+ in the last 5 seasons5-936%from 57%-5.0n=14
on the road + in a conference game28-2157%from 56%+2.9n=49
+ vs an FBS opponent28-2157%from 57%+2.9n=49
+ vs a P5 opponent28-2157%from 57%+2.9n=49
+ vs the ACC28-2157%from 57%+2.9n=49
+ in October12-1055%from 57%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons9-1145%from 57%-0.8n=20
+ vs a P5 opponent28-2157%from 57%+2.9n=49
+ vs the ACC28-2157%from 57%+2.9n=49
+ in October12-1055%from 57%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons9-1145%from 57%-0.8n=20
+ vs the ACC28-2157%from 57%+2.9n=49
+ in October12-1055%from 57%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons9-1145%from 57%-0.8n=20
+ in October12-1055%from 57%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons3-633%from 55%-4.6n=9
+ in the last 5 seasons9-1145%from 57%-0.8n=20
on the road + vs the ACC28-2157%from 56%+2.9n=49
+ in October12-1055%from 57%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons3-633%from 55%-4.6n=9
+ in the last 5 seasons9-1145%from 57%-0.8n=20
on the road + vs an FBS opponent35-2756%from 56%+1.4n=62
+ vs the ACC28-2157%from 56%+2.9n=49
+ in October12-1055%from 57%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons9-1145%from 57%-0.8n=20
+ vs a P5 opponent33-2656%from 56%+1.1n=59
+ vs the ACC28-2157%from 56%+2.9n=49
+ in October13-1154%from 56%+1.9n=24
+ in the last 5 seasons12-1446%from 56%-2.5n=26
+ in October13-1154%from 56%+1.9n=24
+ in the last 5 seasons4-736%from 54%-4.9n=11
+ in the last 5 seasons13-1448%from 56%-2.1n=27
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.