Massachusetts at RutgersRutgers -30.5o/u 54.5
ST Model Rutgers -35.6(+5.1 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Massachusetts — the basics
131 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 32-38 | 46% | -2.8 | n=70 |
| as an underdog | 46-60 | 43% | -2.8 | n=106 |
| spread 21+ | 20-20 | 50% | -1.1 | n=40 |
| out of conference | 43-59 | 42% | -2.8 | n=102 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 51-69 | 43% | -3.1 | n=120 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 21-25 | 46% | -0.4 | n=46 |
| vs the Big Ten | 1-4 | 20% | -9.3 | n=5 |
| in September | 17-27 | 39% | -3.5 | n=44 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 23-36 | 39% | -4.8 | n=59 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Massachusetts — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -12.4 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 131 graded games: -3.3 pts vs their number per game | n=131 |
Massachusetts — combinations
0 lean Massachusetts · 170 lean against
Read this first. 187 combinations shown. The best one here is 50%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 60% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| spread 21+ + vs a P5 opponent | 13-13 | 50%from 50% | +0.2 | n=26 |
| + in September | 5-5 | 50%from 50% | +5.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 50% | +2.6 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-7 | 46%from 50% | -0.7 | n=13 |
| as an underdog + spread 21+ | 19-20 | 49%from 43% | -1.3 | n=39 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 13-13 | 50%from 49% | +0.2 | n=26 |
| + in September | 5-5 | 50%from 50% | +5.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-7 | 46%from 50% | -0.7 | n=13 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 19-20 | 49%from 49% | -1.3 | n=39 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 13-13 | 50%from 49% | +0.2 | n=26 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 49% | -1.9 | n=20 |
| + in September | 6-8 | 43%from 49% | +1.9 | n=14 |
| + out of conference | 17-20 | 46%from 49% | -1.6 | n=37 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 12-13 | 48%from 46% | +0.0 | n=25 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 17-20 | 46%from 46% | -1.6 | n=37 |
| + in September | 6-8 | 43%from 46% | +1.9 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-11 | 39%from 46% | -2.7 | n=18 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 49% | -1.9 | n=20 |
| + in September | 6-8 | 43%from 49% | +1.9 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-6 | 33%from 43% | -1.5 | n=9 |
| spread 21+ + vs an FBS opponent | 19-20 | 49%from 50% | -1.3 | n=39 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 13-13 | 50%from 49% | +0.2 | n=26 |
| + in September | 5-5 | 50%from 50% | +5.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-7 | 46%from 50% | -0.7 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-11 | 45%from 49% | -1.9 | n=20 |
| + in September | 6-8 | 43%from 49% | +1.9 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 3-6 | 33%from 43% | -1.5 | n=9 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.