Washington State at WashingtonWashington -21.5o/u 50.5
ST Model Washington -13.8(-7.7 vs market)
Trends · 2026 week 1
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Washington State — the basics
141 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 34-27 | 56% | +2.1 | n=61 |
| vs Washington | 3-8 | 27% | -8.3 | n=11 |
| as an underdog | 42-27 | 61% | +2.1 | n=69 |
| spread 21+ | 6-6 | 50% | +2.0 | n=12 |
| out of conference | 29-24 | 55% | +1.3 | n=53 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 77-54 | 59% | +2.3 | n=131 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 63-40 | 61% | +2.9 | n=103 |
| vs the Big Ten | 4-3 | 57% | +1.1 | n=7 |
| in September | 25-17 | 60% | +1.1 | n=42 |
| at this venue | 2-3 | 40% | -4.1 | n=5 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 38-26 | 59% | +2.2 | n=64 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Washington State — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +8.1 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 141 graded games: +1.9 pts vs their number per game | n=141 |
| Washington State has covered 4 straight | n=4 |
Washington State — combinations
113 lean Washington State · 29 lean against
Read this first. 155 combinations shown. The best one here is 89%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 85% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs the Big Ten + in September | 4-1 | 80%from 57% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in September | 15-4 | 79%from 61% | +4.0 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-2 | 78%from 79% | +5.0 | n=9 |
| as an underdog + in September | 15-5 | 75%from 61% | +2.3 | n=20 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-4 | 67%from 75% | +0.8 | n=12 |
| out of conference + vs a P5 opponent | 11-4 | 73%from 55% | +6.7 | n=15 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-1 | 89%from 73% | +11.5 | n=9 |
| + in September | 6-1 | 86%from 73% | +11.7 | n=7 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-1 | 80%from 86% | +11.1 | n=5 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 4-3 | 57%from 73% | +1.1 | n=7 |
| + in September | 4-1 | 80%from 57% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| as an underdog + out of conference | 14-6 | 70%from 61% | +4.3 | n=20 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-2 | 82%from 70% | +8.1 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-1 | 89%from 82% | +11.5 | n=9 |
| + in September | 5-1 | 83%from 82% | +10.7 | n=6 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 4-2 | 67%from 82% | +3.0 | n=6 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-4 | 75%from 70% | +6.2 | n=16 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 14-6 | 70%from 70% | +4.3 | n=20 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 9-2 | 82%from 70% | +8.1 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-4 | 75%from 70% | +6.2 | n=16 |
| + in September | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +3.8 | n=10 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 4-2 | 67%from 70% | +3.0 | n=6 |
| + in September | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +3.8 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-3 | 63%from 70% | +2.5 | n=8 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 4-2 | 67%from 70% | +3.0 | n=6 |
| + in September | 4-1 | 80%from 67% | +8.1 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.