How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Penn State — the basics
149 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 31-24 | 56% | +2.5 | n=55 |
| out of conference | 28-15 | 65% | +3.3 | n=43 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 84-63 | 57% | +2.3 | n=147 |
| vs a G5 opponent | 14-9 | 61% | +0.7 | n=23 |
| in September | 26-16 | 62% | +2.8 | n=42 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 38-29 | 57% | +2.2 | n=67 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Penn State — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -2.3 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 149 graded games: +2.2 pts vs their number per game | n=149 |
Penn State — combinations
30 lean Penn State · 4 lean against
Read this first. 40 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 2.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + out of conference | 4-1 | 80%from 56% | +9.8 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +9.8 | n=5 |
| on the road + in September | 9-4 | 69%from 56% | +6.3 | n=13 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 69% | +8.8 | n=5 |
| out of conference + vs an FBS opponent | 28-13 | 68%from 65% | +3.7 | n=41 |
| + in September | 16-8 | 67%from 68% | +3.2 | n=24 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-3 | 70%from 67% | +2.5 | n=10 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 14-7 | 67%from 68% | +1.2 | n=21 |
| + in September | 11-6 | 65%from 67% | +0.9 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 67% | -1.3 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 13-7 | 65%from 68% | +3.6 | n=20 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs a G5 opponent | 14-7 | 67%from 57% | +1.2 | n=21 |
| + in September | 11-6 | 65%from 67% | +0.9 | n=17 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-3 | 57%from 65% | -1.1 | n=7 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 67% | -1.3 | n=9 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in September | 26-14 | 65%from 57% | +3.1 | n=40 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-5 | 71%from 65% | +2.6 | n=17 |
| in September + in the last 5 seasons | 12-7 | 63%from 62% | +1.8 | n=19 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 15-9 | 63%from 56% | +3.8 | n=24 |
| out of conference + in September | 16-10 | 62%from 65% | +2.6 | n=26 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 7-5 | 58%from 62% | +1.3 | n=12 |
| out of conference + vs a G5 opponent | 14-9 | 61%from 65% | +0.7 | n=23 |
| + in September | 11-8 | 58%from 61% | +0.3 | n=19 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 4-5 | 44%from 58% | -1.9 | n=9 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-6 | 45%from 61% | -1.9 | n=11 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.