How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Notre Dame — the basics
148 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 27-21 | 56% | +2.8 | n=48 |
| out of conference | 77-55 | 58% | +3.3 | n=132 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 85-62 | 58% | +3.5 | n=147 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 70-50 | 58% | +3.9 | n=120 |
| vs the Big Ten | 11-7 | 61% | +4.1 | n=18 |
| in September | 28-18 | 61% | +4.3 | n=46 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 43-23 | 65% | +6.4 | n=66 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Notre Dame — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +4.5 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 148 graded games: +3.5 pts vs their number per game | n=148 |
Notre Dame — combinations
82 lean Notre Dame · 0 lean against
Read this first. 89 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 80% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 5.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs the Big Ten + in September | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +12.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 80% | +20.0 | n=5 |
| vs the Big Ten + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +11.1 | n=10 |
| on the road + vs the Big Ten | 4-1 | 80%from 56% | +10.3 | n=5 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 37-14 | 73%from 58% | +8.8 | n=51 |
| on the road + in September | 10-4 | 71%from 56% | +12.5 | n=14 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-1 | 86%from 71% | +17.5 | n=7 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 14-7 | 67%from 56% | +6.8 | n=21 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 42-23 | 65%from 58% | +6.4 | n=65 |
| out of conference + in September | 28-16 | 64%from 58% | +4.8 | n=44 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-7 | 61%from 64% | +4.4 | n=18 |
| vs a P5 opponent + in September | 21-12 | 64%from 58% | +6.7 | n=33 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-3 | 77%from 64% | +11.6 | n=13 |
| out of conference + in the last 5 seasons | 38-22 | 63%from 58% | +6.0 | n=60 |
| out of conference + vs the Big Ten | 11-7 | 61%from 58% | +4.1 | n=18 |
| + in September | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +12.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 80% | +20.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +11.1 | n=10 |
| vs an FBS opponent + vs the Big Ten | 11-7 | 61%from 58% | +4.1 | n=18 |
| + in September | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +12.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 80% | +20.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +11.1 | n=10 |
| vs a P5 opponent + vs the Big Ten | 11-7 | 61%from 58% | +4.1 | n=18 |
| + in September | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +12.3 | n=10 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-0 | 100%from 80% | +20.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-2 | 80%from 61% | +11.1 | n=10 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.