Michigan at Minnesota

ST Model Michigan -8.6
Trends · 2026 week 5
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Michigan — the basics
150 graded games since 2014
on the road29-2554%+1.5n=54
vs Minnesota3-350%+2.1n=6
in a conference game60-4557%+2.1n=105
vs an FBS opponent78-7252%+1.4n=150
vs a P5 opponent70-5954%+1.6n=129
vs the Big Ten60-4557%+2.1n=105
in October23-1856%+3.4n=41
in the last 5 seasons39-3057%+3.4n=69
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Michigan — form & streaks
Last 12 games: -0.6 pts vs their number per gamen=12
All 150 graded games: +1.4 pts vs their number per gamen=150
Michigan has failed to cover 2 straightn=2
Michigan — combinations
75 lean Michigan · 5 lean against
Read this first. 113 combinations shown. The best one here is 68%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 67% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
CombinationRec%PtsSample
on the road + in the last 5 seasons15-865%from 54%+6.0n=23
in a conference game + in the last 5 seasons30-1863%from 57%+4.3n=48
vs the Big Ten + in the last 5 seasons30-1863%from 57%+4.3n=48
vs a P5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons35-2360%from 54%+3.8n=58
on the road + in a conference game29-2158%from 54%+2.6n=50
+ in the last 5 seasons15-768%from 58%+6.6n=22
+ vs an FBS opponent29-2158%from 58%+2.6n=50
+ in the last 5 seasons15-768%from 58%+6.6n=22
+ vs a P5 opponent29-2158%from 58%+2.6n=50
+ vs the Big Ten29-2158%from 58%+2.6n=50
+ in October11-1150%from 58%+2.7n=22
+ vs a P5 opponent29-2158%from 58%+2.6n=50
+ in the last 5 seasons15-768%from 58%+6.6n=22
+ vs the Big Ten29-2158%from 58%+2.6n=50
+ in October11-1150%from 58%+2.7n=22
+ vs the Big Ten29-2158%from 58%+2.6n=50
+ in the last 5 seasons15-768%from 58%+6.6n=22
+ in October11-1150%from 58%+2.7n=22
+ in October11-1150%from 58%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons5-645%from 50%+1.6n=11
on the road + vs the Big Ten29-2158%from 54%+2.6n=50
+ in the last 5 seasons15-768%from 58%+6.6n=22
+ in October11-1150%from 58%+2.7n=22
+ in the last 5 seasons5-645%from 50%+1.6n=11
in a conference game + vs an FBS opponent60-4557%from 57%+2.1n=105
+ in the last 5 seasons30-1863%from 57%+4.3n=48
+ vs a P5 opponent60-4557%from 57%+2.1n=105
+ in the last 5 seasons30-1863%from 57%+4.3n=48
+ vs the Big Ten60-4557%from 57%+2.1n=105
+ in October22-1855%from 57%+2.7n=40
+ vs the Big Ten60-4557%from 57%+2.1n=105
+ in the last 5 seasons30-1863%from 57%+4.3n=48
+ in October22-1855%from 57%+2.7n=40
+ in October22-1855%from 57%+2.7n=40
+ in the last 5 seasons10-856%from 55%+3.4n=18
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.