Minnesota at Purdue

ST Model Purdue -0.8
Trends · 2026 week 6
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Minnesota — the basics
138 graded games since 2014
on the road29-2554%+0.6n=54
vs Purdue5-550%+2.1n=10
in a conference game52-4554%+0.9n=97
vs an FBS opponent71-6253%+1.0n=133
vs a P5 opponent62-5155%+1.7n=113
vs the Big Ten52-4554%+0.9n=97
in October23-1856%-0.2n=41
at this venue3-260%+2.3n=5
in the last 5 seasons34-2855%+1.0n=62
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Minnesota — form & streaks
Last 12 games: -0.8 pts vs their number per gamen=12
All 138 graded games: +1.2 pts vs their number per gamen=138
Minnesota has covered 3 straightn=3
Minnesota — combinations
127 lean Minnesota · 22 lean against
Read this first. 177 combinations shown. The best one here is 65%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 75% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
CombinationRec%PtsSample
in October + in the last 5 seasons11-665%from 56%+1.0n=17
on the road + vs Purdue3-260%from 54%+2.3n=5
+ in a conference game3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs an FBS opponent3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs a P5 opponent3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs the Big Ten3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ at this venue3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs an FBS opponent3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs a P5 opponent3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs the Big Ten3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ at this venue3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs a P5 opponent3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs the Big Ten3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ at this venue3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ vs the Big Ten3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ at this venue3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
+ at this venue3-260%from 60%+2.3n=5
on the road + at this venue3-260%from 54%+2.3n=5
vs Purdue + at this venue3-260%from 50%+2.3n=5
in a conference game + at this venue3-260%from 54%+2.3n=5
vs an FBS opponent + at this venue3-260%from 53%+2.3n=5
vs a P5 opponent + at this venue3-260%from 55%+2.3n=5
vs the Big Ten + at this venue3-260%from 54%+2.3n=5
on the road + in a conference game27-2156%from 54%+0.1n=48
+ at this venue3-260%from 56%+2.3n=5
+ vs an FBS opponent27-2156%from 56%+0.1n=48
+ at this venue3-260%from 56%+2.3n=5
+ vs a P5 opponent27-2156%from 56%+0.1n=48
+ vs the Big Ten27-2156%from 56%+0.1n=48
+ in October10-953%from 56%-2.6n=19
+ in the last 5 seasons10-1148%from 56%-1.9n=21
+ vs a P5 opponent27-2156%from 56%+0.1n=48
+ at this venue3-260%from 56%+2.3n=5
+ vs the Big Ten27-2156%from 56%+0.1n=48
+ in October10-953%from 56%-2.6n=19
+ in the last 5 seasons10-1148%from 56%-1.9n=21
+ vs the Big Ten27-2156%from 56%+0.1n=48
+ at this venue3-260%from 56%+2.3n=5
+ in October10-953%from 56%-2.6n=19
+ in the last 5 seasons10-1148%from 56%-1.9n=21
+ in October10-953%from 56%-2.6n=19
+ in the last 5 seasons4-450%from 53%-6.4n=8
+ in the last 5 seasons10-1148%from 56%-1.9n=21
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.