How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Wisconsin — the basics
148 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 32-23 | 58% | +1.8 | n=55 |
| vs Purdue | 7-3 | 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| in a conference game | 52-53 | 50% | -0.7 | n=105 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 73-72 | 50% | +0.0 | n=145 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 62-63 | 50% | -0.7 | n=125 |
| vs the Big Ten | 52-53 | 50% | -0.7 | n=105 |
| in November | 23-21 | 52% | +0.7 | n=44 |
| at this venue | 5-0 | 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 28-34 | 45% | -2.2 | n=62 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Wisconsin — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -1.6 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 148 graded games: -0.0 pts vs their number per game | n=148 |
Wisconsin — combinations
112 lean Wisconsin · 45 lean against
Read this first. 166 combinations shown. The best one here is 100%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 63% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 53.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs Purdue | 5-0 | 100%from 58% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + in a conference game | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 100% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| on the road + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 58% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| vs Purdue + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 70% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| in a conference game + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 50% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| vs an FBS opponent + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 50% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| vs a P5 opponent + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 50% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| vs the Big Ten + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 50% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| vs Purdue + in a conference game | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 70% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 70% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 70% | +8.1 | n=5 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 7-3 | 70%from 70% | +6.8 | n=10 |
| + at this venue | 5-0 | 100%from 70% | +8.1 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.