How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Purdue — the basics
138 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 32-24 | 57% | +1.0 | n=56 |
| vs Indiana | 6-5 | 55% | -2.8 | n=11 |
| in a conference game | 46-55 | 46% | -1.3 | n=101 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 59-73 | 45% | -2.1 | n=132 |
| vs a P5 opponent | 56-65 | 46% | -1.7 | n=121 |
| vs the Big Ten | 46-55 | 46% | -1.3 | n=101 |
| in November | 22-23 | 49% | -2.5 | n=45 |
| at this venue | 3-2 | 60% | -4.0 | n=5 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 24-38 | 39% | -3.1 | n=62 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Purdue — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -6.3 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 138 graded games: -1.5 pts vs their number per game | n=138 |
| Purdue has failed to cover 2 straight | n=2 |
Purdue — combinations
107 lean Purdue · 54 lean against
Read this first. 188 combinations shown. The best one here is 62%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 62% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + in November | 13-8 | 62%from 57% | -0.1 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 62% | 0.0 | n=9 |
| on the road + in a conference game | 29-18 | 62%from 57% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + in November | 13-8 | 62%from 62% | -0.1 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 62% | 0.0 | n=9 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 29-18 | 62%from 62% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + in November | 13-8 | 62%from 62% | -0.1 | n=21 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 29-18 | 62%from 62% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 29-18 | 62%from 62% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + at this venue | 3-2 | 60%from 62% | -4.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-10 | 50%from 62% | -1.6 | n=20 |
| + vs a P5 opponent | 29-18 | 62%from 62% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + in November | 13-8 | 62%from 62% | -0.1 | n=21 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 29-18 | 62%from 62% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + at this venue | 3-2 | 60%from 62% | -4.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-10 | 50%from 62% | -1.6 | n=20 |
| + vs the Big Ten | 29-18 | 62%from 62% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + in November | 13-8 | 62%from 62% | -0.1 | n=21 |
| + at this venue | 3-2 | 60%from 62% | -4.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-10 | 50%from 62% | -1.6 | n=20 |
| + at this venue | 3-2 | 60%from 62% | -4.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-10 | 50%from 62% | -1.6 | n=20 |
| on the road + vs the Big Ten | 29-18 | 62%from 57% | +1.0 | n=47 |
| + in November | 13-8 | 62%from 62% | -0.1 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 62% | 0.0 | n=9 |
| + at this venue | 3-2 | 60%from 62% | -4.0 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 10-10 | 50%from 62% | -1.6 | n=20 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.