How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Tulane — the basics
151 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 37-33 | 53% | -1.2 | n=70 |
| vs Army | 4-2 | 67% | +1.3 | n=6 |
| in a conference game | 53-43 | 55% | +0.4 | n=96 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 76-66 | 54% | +0.3 | n=142 |
| vs a G5 opponent | 70-52 | 57% | +1.6 | n=122 |
| vs the American Athletic | 54-43 | 56% | +0.6 | n=97 |
| in October | 23-18 | 56% | -1.2 | n=41 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 38-29 | 57% | +1.3 | n=67 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Tulane — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -3.3 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 151 graded games: +0.9 pts vs their number per game | n=151 |
Tulane — combinations
72 lean Tulane · 2 lean against
Read this first. 100 combinations shown. The best one here is 71%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 67% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs Army + vs an FBS opponent | 4-2 | 67%from 67% | +1.3 | n=6 |
| on the road + in the last 5 seasons | 19-11 | 63%from 53% | +0.6 | n=30 |
| on the road + in a conference game | 28-19 | 60%from 53% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-6 | 71%from 60% | +1.4 | n=21 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 28-19 | 60%from 60% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-6 | 71%from 60% | +1.4 | n=21 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 28-19 | 60%from 60% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + vs the American Athletic | 28-19 | 60%from 60% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in October | 10-10 | 50%from 60% | -4.3 | n=20 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 28-19 | 60%from 60% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-6 | 71%from 60% | +1.4 | n=21 |
| + vs the American Athletic | 28-19 | 60%from 60% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in October | 10-10 | 50%from 60% | -4.3 | n=20 |
| + vs the American Athletic | 28-19 | 60%from 60% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-6 | 71%from 60% | +1.4 | n=21 |
| + in October | 10-10 | 50%from 60% | -4.3 | n=20 |
| + in October | 10-10 | 50%from 60% | -4.3 | n=20 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 50% | -2.4 | n=9 |
| on the road + vs the American Athletic | 28-19 | 60%from 53% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-6 | 71%from 60% | +1.4 | n=21 |
| + in October | 10-10 | 50%from 60% | -4.3 | n=20 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 50% | -2.4 | n=9 |
| vs a G5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 31-22 | 58%from 57% | +1.9 | n=53 |
| vs the American Athletic + in the last 5 seasons | 25-18 | 58%from 56% | +1.7 | n=43 |
| on the road + vs a G5 opponent | 31-23 | 57%from 53% | -0.4 | n=54 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 17-7 | 71%from 57% | +1.5 | n=24 |
| + vs the American Athletic | 28-19 | 60%from 57% | -0.4 | n=47 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 15-6 | 71%from 60% | +1.4 | n=21 |
| + in October | 10-10 | 50%from 60% | -4.3 | n=20 |
| + in October | 10-11 | 48%from 57% | -5.3 | n=21 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-4 | 56%from 48% | -2.4 | n=9 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.