How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Central Michigan — the basics
135 graded games since 2014
| at a neutral site | 2-7 | 22% | -16.4 | n=9 |
| vs Eastern Michigan | 7-4 | 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| in a conference game | 49-41 | 54% | +1.0 | n=90 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 66-60 | 52% | -0.4 | n=126 |
| vs a G5 opponent | 58-52 | 53% | -0.1 | n=110 |
| vs the Mid-American | 49-41 | 54% | +1.0 | n=90 |
| in November | 27-13 | 68% | +3.8 | n=40 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 28-32 | 47% | -1.0 | n=60 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Central Michigan — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +0.1 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 135 graded games: -0.3 pts vs their number per game | n=135 |
| Central Michigan has failed to cover 2 straight | n=2 |
Central Michigan — combinations
61 lean Central Michigan · 28 lean against
Read this first. 97 combinations shown. The best one here is 71%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 68% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs Eastern Michigan + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| in a conference game + in November | 27-13 | 68%from 54% | +3.8 | n=40 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-7 | 63%from 68% | +3.7 | n=19 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in November | 27-13 | 68%from 52% | +3.8 | n=40 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-7 | 63%from 68% | +3.7 | n=19 |
| vs a G5 opponent + in November | 27-13 | 68%from 53% | +3.8 | n=40 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-7 | 63%from 68% | +3.7 | n=19 |
| vs the Mid-American + in November | 27-13 | 68%from 54% | +3.8 | n=40 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 12-7 | 63%from 68% | +3.7 | n=19 |
| vs Eastern Michigan + in a conference game | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
| vs Eastern Michigan + vs an FBS opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 7-4 | 64%from 64% | +4.0 | n=11 |
| + in November | 5-2 | 71%from 64% | +1.6 | n=7 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 64% | -0.5 | n=5 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.