How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Massachusetts — the basics
131 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 32-38 | 46% | -2.8 | n=70 |
| vs Toledo | 3-3 | 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
| in a conference game | 12-17 | 41% | -4.9 | n=29 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 51-69 | 43% | -3.1 | n=120 |
| vs a G5 opponent | 34-51 | 40% | -4.8 | n=85 |
| vs the Mid-American | 16-22 | 42% | -4.3 | n=38 |
| in November | 20-21 | 49% | -3.0 | n=41 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 23-36 | 39% | -4.8 | n=59 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Massachusetts — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: -12.4 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 131 graded games: -3.3 pts vs their number per game | n=131 |
Massachusetts — combinations
22 lean Massachusetts · 48 lean against
Read this first. 96 combinations shown. The best one here is 82%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 64% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + in November | 16-8 | 67%from 46% | +1.4 | n=24 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 6-4 | 60%from 67% | +2.3 | n=10 |
| vs an FBS opponent + in November | 20-17 | 54%from 43% | -2.1 | n=37 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 8-8 | 50%from 54% | -2.5 | n=16 |
| on the road + in a conference game | 7-6 | 54%from 46% | -1.9 | n=13 |
| + in November | 3-2 | 60%from 54% | -3.9 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 7-6 | 54%from 54% | -1.9 | n=13 |
| + in November | 3-2 | 60%from 54% | -3.9 | n=5 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 6-6 | 50%from 54% | -3.4 | n=12 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 6-6 | 50%from 54% | -3.4 | n=12 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 54% | -8.7 | n=5 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 6-6 | 50%from 54% | -3.4 | n=12 |
| + in November | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | -3.9 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 6-6 | 50%from 50% | -3.4 | n=12 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 6-6 | 50%from 54% | -3.4 | n=12 |
| + in November | 3-2 | 60%from 50% | -3.9 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 2-3 | 40%from 54% | -8.7 | n=5 |
| on the road + vs the Mid-American | 10-9 | 53%from 46% | -3.0 | n=19 |
| + in November | 3-2 | 60%from 53% | -3.9 | n=5 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-5 | 50%from 53% | -7.2 | n=10 |
| vs Toledo + vs an FBS opponent | 3-3 | 50%from 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 3-3 | 50%from 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 3-3 | 50%from 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 3-3 | 50%from 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
| vs Toledo + vs a G5 opponent | 3-3 | 50%from 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 3-3 | 50%from 50% | -3.3 | n=6 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.