How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. FBS teams carry far less history than NFL ones (a median of 148 graded games vs ~435), so that baseline runs higher here — a perfect record is cheaper in college. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself.
Akron — the basics
132 graded games since 2014
| on the road | 33-36 | 48% | -1.9 | n=69 |
| vs Miami (OH) | 5-6 | 45% | -0.9 | n=11 |
| in a conference game | 44-48 | 48% | -2.5 | n=92 |
| vs an FBS opponent | 56-68 | 45% | -2.8 | n=124 |
| vs a G5 opponent | 52-59 | 47% | -1.9 | n=111 |
| vs the Mid-American | 44-48 | 48% | -2.5 | n=92 |
| in October | 19-23 | 45% | -3.4 | n=42 |
| at this venue | 4-1 | 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 29-29 | 50% | -0.4 | n=58 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line
Akron — form & streaks
| Last 12 games: +0.8 pts vs their number per game | n=12 |
| All 132 graded games: -2.4 pts vs their number per game | n=132 |
Akron — combinations
92 lean Akron · 73 lean against
Read this first. 177 combinations shown. The best one here is 80%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 65% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| on the road + vs Miami (OH) | 4-1 | 80%from 48% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + in a conference game | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs an FBS opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs a G5 opponent | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + vs the Mid-American | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 80% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| on the road + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 48% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| vs Miami (OH) + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 45% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| in a conference game + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 48% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| vs an FBS opponent + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 45% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| vs a G5 opponent + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 47% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| vs the Mid-American + at this venue | 4-1 | 80%from 48% | +6.9 | n=5 |
| in a conference game + in the last 5 seasons | 22-17 | 56%from 48% | +0.9 | n=39 |
| vs the Mid-American + in the last 5 seasons | 22-17 | 56%from 48% | +0.9 | n=39 |
| vs a G5 opponent + in the last 5 seasons | 26-21 | 55%from 47% | +1.0 | n=47 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice or any guarantee of outcome. A trend describes the past; it does not predict. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.