BUF at LARLAR -3o/u 53.5
ST Model LAR -4.3(+1.3 vs market)
Since first recorded LAR -3o/u 53.5unchanged · 43d ago · 1 books
Trends · player props · 2026 week 5
How to read this: every angle below is a true fact about these teams — and there are hundreds of them, so some will look striking by pure chance. Each side's combinations carry a chance baseline telling you how good the best one would look if nothing were going on. Signals disagreeing is normal; weigh them yourself. There is deliberately no single verdict here.
BUF — the basics
423 graded games since 1999
| on the road | 108-101 | 52% | +0.1 | 77/209 | n=209 |
| vs LAR | 5-2 | 71% | +6.4 | 3/7 | n=7 |
| as an underdog | 110-110 | 50% | -0.8 | 54/220 | n=220 |
| spread 3 | 31-29 | 52% | -0.2 | 13/60 | n=60 |
| on Monday night | 9-10 | 47% | +3.7 | 13/19 | n=19 |
| in October | 46-52 | 47% | -0.7 | 32/98 | n=98 |
| indoors | 21-24 | 47% | -0.8 | 20/45 | n=45 |
| on turf | 155-146 | 52% | +1.1 | 117/301 | n=301 |
| under this head coach | 85-73 | 54% | +2.3 | 158/158 | n=158 |
| in the last 5 seasons | 47-45 | 51% | +2.8 | 92/92 | n=92 |
record vs the closing number · pts = avg margin vs the line · x/n = games under the current head coach
BUF — form & streaks
| Last 16 games: -0.0 pts vs their number per game | n=16 |
| All 423 graded games: +0.5 pts vs their number per game | n=423 |
BUF — combinations
47 lean BUF · 47 lean against
Read this first. 122 combinations shown. The best one here is 71%. With this many combinations you'd expect the best to be about 86% by chance alone, and about 0 perfect records — this matchup has 0.
| Combination | Rec | % | Pts | Now | Sample |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| vs LAR + on turf | 4-2 | 67%from 71% | +6.0 | 3/6 | n=6 |
| indoors + under this head coach | 12-8 | 60%from 47% | +3.4 | 20/20 | n=20 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-6 | 45%from 60% | +0.4 | 11/11 | n=11 |
| spread 3 + in October | 8-6 | 57%from 52% | +1.3 | 4/14 | n=14 |
| + on turf | 7-4 | 64%from 57% | +5.5 | 2/11 | n=11 |
| on the road + under this head coach | 42-35 | 55%from 52% | +2.3 | 77/77 | n=77 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 22-22 | 50%from 55% | +2.4 | 44/44 | n=44 |
| as an underdog + in October | 27-23 | 54%from 50% | -0.9 | 10/50 | n=50 |
| + indoors | 5-4 | 56%from 54% | -2.4 | 4/9 | n=9 |
| + on turf | 4-3 | 57%from 56% | -1.0 | 4/7 | n=7 |
| + on turf | 16-14 | 53%from 54% | +0.7 | 8/30 | n=30 |
| + under this head coach | 3-5 | 38%from 53% | -1.6 | 8/8 | n=8 |
| + under this head coach | 5-5 | 50%from 54% | +1.9 | 10/10 | n=10 |
| as an underdog + under this head coach | 29-25 | 54%from 50% | +1.5 | 54/54 | n=54 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 9-8 | 53%from 54% | +3.1 | 17/17 | n=17 |
| spread 3 + on turf | 22-19 | 54%from 52% | +1.2 | 9/41 | n=41 |
| + under this head coach | 3-6 | 33%from 54% | -1.3 | 9/9 | n=9 |
| as an underdog + on turf | 69-61 | 53%from 50% | +0.7 | 32/130 | n=130 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 53% | +4.4 | 7/7 | n=7 |
| + under this head coach | 18-14 | 56%from 53% | +2.7 | 32/32 | n=32 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 5-2 | 71%from 56% | +4.4 | 7/7 | n=7 |
| on turf + under this head coach | 62-55 | 53%from 52% | +2.4 | 117/117 | n=117 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 36-34 | 51%from 53% | +2.6 | 70/70 | n=70 |
| as an underdog + in the last 5 seasons | 9-8 | 53%from 50% | +3.1 | 17/17 | n=17 |
| on the road + on turf | 46-41 | 53%from 52% | +1.4 | 36/87 | n=87 |
| + under this head coach | 19-17 | 53%from 53% | +2.6 | 36/36 | n=36 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-11 | 50%from 53% | +1.3 | 22/22 | n=22 |
| + in the last 5 seasons | 11-11 | 50%from 53% | +1.3 | 22/22 | n=22 |
indented rows narrow the one above · click any row for the games behind it · “Now” = games played by this team as it exists today
Informational only. Historical splits are shared for analysis and entertainment — not betting advice, picks for profit, or any guarantee of outcome. A trend is a description of the past, not a prediction. Must be 21+ where applicable. If gambling is a problem, call 1-800-GAMBLER.